A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: Illegal string offset 'set_all_segments'

Filename: extensions/ext.low_seg2cat.php

Line Number: 134

MN2020 - Occupation U.S.A.
Archive Hosted by the AFL-CIO

Occupation U.S.A.

October 19, 2011 By Michael J. Diedrich, Policy Associate

As the Occupy movement grows, pushback continues from some conservative quarters. Hippie-punching is easy, and it's been a while since there's been a truly substantial series of non-Tea Party protests, so I can in part understand their happiness to spar with an old foil in new clothes.

For those who want the Occupiers to go away, however, I've got a radical proposal: help them get an occupation.

Even better, help the people who aren't at the protests get an occupation. If this was really just about lazy college students, nothing would chop the legs out from under the movement like a working class near full employment.

The thing is, this isn't actually about lazy college students. The educated-but-unemployed twenty- and thirtysomethings that have become the public face of this movement are just the smoke that set off the alarm. The fire started years ago, and its real victims are the people who don't make it in front of the cameras.

To place all the responsibility for their own employment on the Occupiers' shoulders is ridiculous. We don't have 9% unemployment in this country because of college graduates' lack of gumption. We have 9% unemployment because our country is still suffering from the Great Hangover.

The Great Hangover is the necessary after-effect of the Great Binge. The Great Binge was not, as conservatives would have you believe, about government borrowing. The Great Binge was about getting tipsy on personal debt, which fueled the housing bubble and rising household debt.

Egging the country on were predatory lending and too-easy credit practices. Our designated drivers neglected their responsibilities by deregulating Wall Street and getting buzzed on a GDP-boosting cocktail of derivatives and subprime mortgage tricks. All of this led to "growth" built on money that wasn't actually there, and it felt great while it lasted.

The first burblings of alarm started in 2007 as the housing market started to get shaky. Then came the financial purge of 2008, and our economy was left with no one holding its hair. Everything since has been the Great Hangover.

We drank some water with the early Obama stimulus package, but it wasn't enough to really recuperate. All we did there was make our head stop spinning quite so much. It's time for an aspirin and a regular supply of water; in other words, it's time for jobs.

The private sector's doing some good work on that front, but it can't do enough without more aggregate demand from regular people. For regular people to start demanding things again, they need jobs. When more people have jobs, they can start buying more things. When they start buying more things, the people who make, sell, and ship those things do better. When those people do better, they can hire more employees, pay the employees they have more, and expand their business. When they do these things, they facilitate more demand, which facilitates more buying, and so on.

To get the ball rolling, we need an infusion of more jobs. Our current path of austerity and budget cutting isn't doing it. The balance of private sector growth and public sector contraction means that our job growth the past several months has struggled to keep pace with population growth; that's why the unemployment rate isn't moving much.

If private employment can't do this on its own, public employment must step up. This means more investment in infrastructure, for one, and to a degree larger than that in the initial stimulus (much of which got funneled into balancing state budgets rather than triggering new projects).

Of course, we live in Minnesota where many construction projects get a little difficult when the temperature drops. We need as many of them as we can get during the warmer months (and this will take several summers of sustained investment if it's going to work), but we need other public investment as well.

Unsurprisingly, I see schools as a place where we can get some more people into the workforce. We have more teachers than we have teaching positions in Minnesota, so let's shrink some class sizes and bring back some of those arts and music programs that have been hit so hard in the test-test-test NCLB era.

Let's get some paraprofessional training programs in place to give our students a stronger academic support structure. Let's put together some apprenticeship programs to funnel more money to local businesses and give our kids a taste of what their future careers might be.

Here's the bottom line: instead of criticizing the Occupiers, let's give them an occupation.

Thanks for participating! Commenting on this conversation is now closed.

3 Comments:

  • Retha Dooley says:

    October 25, 2011 at 8:16 am

    I agree with most everything you had to say, however, what was “glaringly” missing was the fact that we have involved ourselves in two unfunded occupation/wars, we have consistently neglected to enact “campaign finance reform”, and we have allowed tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans.

    I believe the only way out of this mess is to re-regulate Wall Street, reform campaign finance reform, get off our oil addiction, re-build and renew our energy grid, invest in wind and solar technologies, re-build our schools, invest in housing for all, and while we’re at it, let’s pass healthcare for all…

    Or, we can just roll-over and become members of the red team or the blue team of the corporate take-over of America…

  • Sheila says:

    October 25, 2011 at 9:03 am

    Right to the point. Excellent commment.

  • Joel says:

    October 25, 2011 at 11:37 am

    One issue that is getting virtually no press is the structure of business focused stimulus. The newest proposal does focus on tax breaks for new employees and raises fro existing employees, but much of what has been spent has been spent on business infrastructure, not new employees, and much of this infrastructure actually puts workers at risk. Robots, computers, and data/management software are just three examples.